Illinois Republican wants to make Chicago area the 51st state

Posted on November 23, 2011


Well this is interesting! Certainly states with two groups that hold vastly different opinions need to do something to make both groups’ voices heard and properly represented. Separating into two states is one way to do it, but I wonder if we can’t just make more laws enacted at the county/city level rather than the state level (and definitely rather than the federal level!) instead (or as well!). Enacting most laws at the state/local level is ESSENTIAL to preserving our democracy. Our voices are more easily heard and represented at the local level, and local level governments are easier to control and hold accountable. There is less chance for corruption and less chance for massive failures that affect tens of thousands of people. We’ll see what happens with Illinois! Certainly this will be one for the history books should it move forward.

Illinois Republican wants to make Chicago area the 51st state

By Chris Moody | The Ticket – 2 hrs 10 mins ago

A state Republican legislator has introduced a bill to the Illinois General Assembly to separate the Chicago’s county from the state–effectively making the midwestern city the 51st state in the union.

The bill, filed by State Rep. Bill Mitchell of Decatur Tuesday, would “enact legislation dividing Illinois and Cook County into separate states” because county residents “hold different and firmly seated views” on “politics, society, and economics” from people in the rest of the state. The bill’s supporters point to higher tax rates and strict gun laws in the Chicago area and contend that the northern county is out of step with its Illinois neighbors.

“These liberal policies are an insult to the traditional values of downstate families,” Mitchell told the Decatur Tribune. “When I talk to constituents, one of the biggest things I hear is ‘Chicago should be its own state . . . .Our voters’ voices were drowned out by Chicago.”

The measure would put the issue up to a vote by state residents through a referendum and then would require approval from the United States Congress and the president. As of this writing, the bill has just one other co-sponsor.